Beg your pardon, but the Gulf of America has officially transitioned and if you continue calling it the Gulf of Mexico, you’re deadnaming it.
Beg your pardon, but the Gulf of America has officially transitioned and if you continue calling it the Gulf of Mexico, you’re deadnaming it.
Have you read the article?
TL;DR: I wouldn’t bet on it
This is the plot to Cyberpunk 2077, isn’t it…
Gulfstream Aerospace presents: Gulf of America powered by Gulf Oil
Buc-ee’s presents: Gulf of America powered by Exxon-Mobil
You should be concerned that someone might construe this as an advertisement
Aaaaaaaaaa
Ah, okay, I get it now.
Sorry, never played that game.
Well, if the intentions are good, but the outcomes are terribly flawed, at what point does it become necessary to re-evaluate or do away with the entire concept?
I honestly don’t know where you’re coming from. If this is supposed to be a joke, it went right over my head.
Getting punched in the face ought to do it
Aye, I’d vote for that
This isn’t strategy. A strategy is a long-term plan. This is just a tactic.
This is what I came here for
Without the coyote, tbe roadrunner would be bored to death
Neighbors
Danke, Merkel ಠ_ಠ
I see you haven’t read the article either, because otherwise you’d know that it doesn’t even answer the question directly, but instead goes to great lengths theorizing about every possible outcome, no matter how unlikely it is.
The TL;DR was my own opinion, but if you actually make it through this piece, I’m fairly sure you’ll agree.