• 2 Posts
  • 5 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 22nd, 2023

help-circle
  • That’s not what anarchism is.

    I like to call anarchism as neighborliness extended as a political ideology. Consider it libertarianism with a pinch of collectivism

    You do it all the time when you organize a group of friends to go to the movies. There is no elected leader.

    When Russia invaded Ukraine, they destroyed a lot of public and military comms infrastructure, so the military ended up teaming up with anarchists because they had a decentralized comms going.

    Anarchism is compatible with existing political ideologies, however in my opinion works best at small scales.


  • I don’t think the analogy to Egypt works, because they have a peace treaty.

    We all know Israel and Saudi Arabia have a shared adversary in the form of Iran. The US wants them to normalize so they can take care of that front.

    As for getting impaled on the stick, I’d say Pakistan got impaled on the stick, because its likely they were the ones hiding Bin Laden.

    As for Saddam falling on the stick, that was due to Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait over several reasons: a desire to reunify, oil, and Kuwait debt. That’s on top of having a history of using chemical weapons for mass murder.

    And as we know, the US loves oil, but so does the world. Globalized markets want to be stable, and the US helps with that


  • A lot of people dont understand US foreign policy. Do not interpret my post as taking a stance.

    US foreign policy is all about 3 key issues, carrot and stick diplomacy, containing China and Russia, and protecting the global market.

    Carrot and stick diplomacy is using positive reinforcement to make changes in totalitarian governments.

    Containing China is all about making friends with countries near China and putting a base there, along with allowing companies, military arms deals, and joint intelligence to happen in that country.

    • That is why the US wants Saudi Arabia and Israel to normalize. And do to that, the US turns a blind eye to tons of bullshit done by countries in the Middle East. If they were to normalize, then a solid logistics chain from Europe to the Gulf can be established, and the two countries would bolster the front there. Then the US could pivot its power projection over to Taiwan.
    • The US is powerful, but its not tactically sound to manage three fronts at the same time.

    If you remember how pissed off the US got when Russia put missiles in Cuba, then you can see why China and Russia will team up with everyone they can to foil this plan to contain them.

    Since the world is now globalized, the US has to protect lots of boats carrying oil, chips, and food. If something fucks up, then everyone pays for it. Of course, if youre resisting western imperialism then its in your best interest to make people suffer by blowing up the boats.

    Now geopolitics makes sense.

    From here, then if youre an idealist, you can make an informed opinion on US foreign policy. Should the US continue its world police campaign at the expense of people suffering under its allies?

    Can you achieve US foreign policy goals without suffering?

    Will a reversal of US foreign policy lead to more domestic suffering in the West due to economic turmoil?

    These questions should be debated and examined thoroughly.