IzzyScissor

Never thought I would see the day where Google crumbles, but they’re actively sprinting towards it now.

Seriously. The recent story of just how many people have died from the cops ‘giving them something to calm them down’ is insane. If you’re not my doctor, you don’t get to dose me with anything.

I remember one time when my dad renewed his car’s tags they misspelled his name on one of the forms and he only noticed after he was leaving.

It took another 30 minutes to sign paperwork confirming that (for example) ‘Austin’ and ‘Austyn’ are the same person, and that this was not intended to cause fraud. I can imagine someone seeing/experiencing that for the first time and thinking they found the perfect loophole.

He was staying at a hotel out-of-state while giving evidence against Boeing.
He was found dead in his car in the hotel parking lot from a ‘self-inflicted wound’.

There’s really no other way to look at it logically than he was murdered by Boeing. Nothing else adds up.

Fantastic news.

Anti-Hamas rage bait. Article ACTUALLY says “there are “reasonable grounds” to believe that Hamas committed rape and “sexualised torture” during its attack in southern Israel on 7 October.”

From OCTOBER.

Israel murdered over a hundred people LAST WEEK who were starving and waiting in line for food and injured around 750 more, so why are we seeing an influx of articles making ‘reasonable assumptions’ against Hamas from 5 months ago? It still doesn’t justify Israel’s actions.

As someone who did, I understand the sentiment but it isn’t that easy. I have so many friends and family members who are stuck there because they can’t save enough resources to leave.

DWI stands for Driving While Intoxicated, not Driving While Impaired. The restriction in the law is against “intoxicating liquor, cannabis, or any drug”.

A heart attack is not liquor, cannabis or a drug, therefore, it is not reasonable to charge this woman with a DWI.

We should refer to him as a convicted rapist all the time.

lmao, no.

It was specifically written after the civil war so that the South could still technically have slavery, they just have to criminalize and convict a person first. It’s how we get the ‘war on drugs’ where even though black and white populations smoke around the same amount, black populations were criminalized FAR harsher, and sent to prison far more often. It’s exactly “Rules for thee, but not for me” on a grand scale where white people would likely ‘get a pass’ for their first arrest. That grace was not extended to black populations, and so we’re back at having slavery with extra steps.

It’s a nice thought that it just happened over time by accident, but in reality it was planned like this.

Honestly, the worst part is going to a doctor who you can tell is mildly religious and they start asking questions about why you think you feel anxiety and depression.

The trauma response to lie and hide is so strong, it takes SO MUCH effort to just be honest that it was your religious upbringing… and the second you do, they act like you’re personally attacking them. I’ve had doctors/nurses go from being warm and kind to suddenly going cold because I had the audacity to say that their religion is the cause of my trauma. You just have to keep looking for a new doctor until someone gets it.

So, openly admitting it was “quid pro quo”. Cool.

From what I understand - the first action the bad actors are taking are releasing the family trees to “out” anyone with Jewish relatives.

So, just hate crimes to start.

Because rules are how society works. If both parties agree to throw out the rules… we don’t have a democracy anymore.

“So Mr. Chairman, you’re saying because you think Sen. Grassley violated the rule, you’re going to violate the rule?” [Sen. John Kennedy] asked.

“It’s called precedent, senator,” replied Durbin.

Jesus Fucking Christ, pick a side, article:

Average age of shooter was 16
“It’s not really about gun ownership”
More than half of the shooters got the firearm they used from a family member or a relative. About 30% got a weapon from the illegal market, while 22% obtained weapons from friends or acquaintances.

So 70% got it through someone who legally owned the gun already, and 30% bought it illegally. A 16 year old cannot purchase a gun legally.

SURE SEEMS LIKE PEOPLE OWNING A GUN IS A FACTOR, THEN, HUH

Rizz = chaRISma

Use it the way your parents would use “game”.

Just a little panic attack - as a treat.

Do installs of the same game by the same user across multiple devices count as different installs?

We treat different devices as different installs. We don’t want to track identity across different devices.

Jesus Christ. A single user can freely install the game repeatedly and bankrupt a creator.