There are some extreme cases I think most people could agree on, like some of the more serious diseases you mentioned. Racist/murderous eugenicists opearte on the opposite side of the spectrum. But what about traits in between that some people think are detrimental but others don’t? I’ not fundamentally disagreeing with you, just curious where you would draw the line and how you think that line should be socially determined and regulated?

Starman in my ass

Here’s a more easily readable version that doesn’t require a download:

https://sci-hub.st/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00728496

I still have a reddit account, but I find Lemmy to be a freer space that feels less overrun by bots and power mods. It also doesn’t seem to cycle through posts as fast, making it more of a discussion-forward space rather than a black hole of doomscrolling.

I qualified my first comment based on that exact criticism. Now what I know about you is that you jump into a conversation without availing yourself of what’s been said.

Run away if you want. By all means save yourself. It doesn’t change the fact that the act is directly harmful to solving the problems you’re running from, and you need to be honest with yourself about that. Cowards like you are why this country is where it is today.

TIL a ham sandwich is a synonym for cowardly pig. But we both knew that already.

Unless you’re a directly targeted demographic, leaving the US is the coward’s way out. You abandon everyone who doesn’t have the means to flee. Stay and fight for something. Running away from problems doesn’t solve them, it just cedes power to the problem.