1·
1 hour agoThe sort of ‘military’ style to the guy’s jacket makes me think you are on to something.
Atelopus-zeteki
- 3 Posts
- 332 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
Cake day: November 15th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
262·24 hours ago“trump supporters” are not a monobloc. And different people value different information in different ways, for their own reasons. We need to peel off as many trump voters as possible. Discouraging statements like “trump supporters do not care about this” help to get trump elected. If you want fascism, u/nutsack, that’s how we get fascism.
5·2 days agoI don’t make things up, I just look them up.
Whoever designed that image should have to return the Fe they were paid.
I’m just reading the article, as you were also able to do, and it says, “On 8 June, officers were made aware via CCTV of a man, Bray, walking down Queens Road, Nuneaton, with the sword in his hand. Bray approached officers with the blade visible, at which point he was arrested.” Bold added for emphasis. If I were out in public in the UK, and if I happened to have a bladed implement, I’d keep it out of sight. Especially if there were police anywhere nearby. But hey, you can do as you please. Have a nice day!
This “victim surcharge” would be termed court cost or court fee in the US.
Not for simply having, but for brandishing said bladed device as the police approached. That’s the law, in that city. As the officer said, “It is possible to find fidget toys that aren’t six-inch blades. It is possible not to walk down the street holding them out in front of you. With a bit more self-awareness, Bray could have avoided contact with us completely.” Bray brought this on himself, and could have avoided any contact with the police. He chose otherwise.
Just raw dogging the calendar?!? I dunno!!
Which, of course, explains why all blind people are thin. And opens a whole new avenue for weight control. We’ll make kitchen light switches that only work within certain BMI ranges. /s
None of them! All of my secret conspiracies are SECRET!
74·9 days agoAh that explains the Hat Bag/ Bag Hat. For it to work properly one would need to have a dent in one’s skull the size of one’s cargo. Think of the hat gag from last week, and sneaking a roast chicken into the theater. ;-)
2·9 days agoSee, you almost escaped trollism. You’ve presented evidence in favor of a stated position. And you trolled everyone in this post on the way to something you could have stated in the original comment. With a little practic SMCF, I believe in you, you could do it. Time will tell how you choose.
It’s not your beliefs, bur rather your trolly behavior, which by the statement above, I believe indicates your are in fact acting as a troll. Tho’ I hold out the possibility that you could abandon those trolly behaviors, if you chose to do so. I’m not entirely sure you believe the statement I’ve called out as trolly. If you had some belief in that area, you might have also evidence to support that belief. Do you also, as you state you do, have beliefs for which there is no evidence? Maybe you shouldn’t “believe everything you think.”
So you literally have no proof. You just made an assertion, to see how people would respond. SMCF, will you abandon your trolly behavior?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025
Executive Summary: Project 2025 envisions widespread changes across the government, particularly economic and social policies and the role of the federal government and its agencies. The plan proposes taking partisan control of the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Department of Commerce, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC), dismantling the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and sharply reducing environmental and climate change regulations to favor fossil fuel production.[7][12] The blueprint seeks to institute tax cuts,[13] though its writers disagree on the wisdom of protectionism.[14] Project 2025 recommends abolishing the Department of Education, whose programs would be either transferred to other agencies, or terminated.[15][16] Funding for climate research would be cut while the National Institutes of Health (NIH) would be reformed along conservative principles.[17][18] The Project urges government to explicitly reject abortion as health care[19][20] and eliminate coverage of emergency contraception under the Affordable Care Act.[21] The Project seeks to infuse the government with elements of Christianity.[6] It proposes criminalizing pornography,[22] removing legal protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity,[22][23] and terminating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs,[3][23] as well as affirmative action.[24] Some conservatives and Republicans have criticized the plan for its stance on climate change[25] and foreign trade.[14] Other critics believe Project 2025 is rhetorical “window-dressing” for what would be four years of personal vengeance at any cost.[26] The project’s authors also acknowledged that most of the proposals would require the Republican Party to control both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate.[26] Other aspects of the plan have recently been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court and would face court challenges, while others still are norm-breaking proposals that might survive court challenges.[27]
The Project recommends the arrest, detention, and deportation of undocumented immigrants living in the United States.[28] It promotes capital punishment and the speedy “finality” of those sentences.[29] Dans acknowledged it was “counterintuitive” to recruit so many to join the government to shrink it, but pointed out the need for a future president to “regain control” of the government.[3] Although the project cannot by law promote a specific presidential candidate, many contributors have close ties to Donald Trump and his 2024 presidential campaign.[30][31] The Washington Post called the project “the most detailed articulation of what a second Trump term would look like.”[32] While initially[when?] the Trump campaign said the project aligned well with their Agenda 47 proposals,[26] the Project has increasingly caused friction with the Trump campaign which has generally avoided specific policy proposals that can be used to criticize him.[32] In July 2024, Trump disavowed Project 2025.[33]