There are few things quite as emblematic of late stage capitalism than the concept of “planned obsolescence”.

  • hoodatninja@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have an 8 year old iPad that can still use Amazon video and can still run Netflix, and google drops support for these computers as early as 3 years. I’m not an Apple fanboy but that is absolutely ridiculous.

      • unconsciousvoidling@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My 2nd gen Apple TV is garbage. Nearly all the apps fail to load now. 🤷‍♂️… I suppose I can try jailbreaking it but it sure feels like someone is trying to force me to upgrade my hardware.

    • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I will give credit to Apple on that one because android phone manufacturers are now supporting their phone for longer because of how long Apple is supporting them.

      • skulblaka@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I remember back in the day when I had apple devices where they would push updates for devices long past their capability to actually run the updated software. Rather than refuse the update or get a pruned patch with security fixes only, it would force updates and bloat your phone and grind it into unresponsive unusability after a few years.

        I hear that’s not so much the case anymore, so that’s nice. But I remember. The main reason I upgraded my phone was because of that, the hardware was great, but I could hardly use the software anymore even after clean installs.

        My point being, I guess, extended support is great if managed properly but it can also become a bludgeon with which to drive you toward the new generations of devices.

        • Sina@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          long past their capability to actually run the updated software

          Well, Apple intentionally slowed those devices down to make the users update, instead of using an insecure device, that would’ve provided a good experience otherwise.

          And these days Apple is retiring devices arbitrarily for profits too. For example this year they are retiring the Iphone 8, which has better hardware, than the ipad 2018 that is still being supported…

          • bedrooms@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That slowness was, at least officially, for the battery health. Do you have the support to prove otherwise?

            • Boiscull@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              And then if I recall correctly (though I can’t be bothered to look) didn’t they get sued for slowing phones?

              So people were mad that their phones battery wasn’t holding a charge anymore, “im being forced to upgrade”, so Apple throttled older phones to keep the battery running, aka allowing people to keep their phones longer, and then they got sued for slowing down phones lol.

              I am an apple fan boy, I wont hide that. But it does seem like they tried to do a “good” and make peoples phones last longer, and then got sued.

              Also the whole forced upgrade just isn’t apples game IMO. Do they want you buying the new one every year, of course. But the more important thing is that you keep using AN iPhone at all. Stay in the ecosystem, stay in the app store, stay paying for icloud, etc.

              Going to a new phone gives the user a window to move away from IOS. (Though most won’t haha)

    • keeb420@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re also not a giant customer who needs security and it services like a school district. 3 years might be early, idk, but in plenty of enterprise or institutes replace their hardware every so often.

      • Sami@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My 2012 laptop runs windows 10 perfectly fine and has the latest security updates. We’re way past the point of using hardware limitations as an excuse for companies to drop support early.

        I don’t see why a school should have to replace their basic computers with an equally basic computer after 3 years unless it’s broken beyond repair. I don’t think the OS itself is doing much more than what an enterprise copy of windows does for security.

        • Nath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Funny you should say this. I have a 2012 Retina Macbook Pro, and yes it is running Windows or Linux with all the latest updates. However, Apple stopped supporting it in 2020. It’s too old for MacOS updates.

          I’ve even seen a guide that will allow me to hack past the normal BIOS restrictions/allow me to put Windows 11 on it.