Archive link

  • Chinese diplomat’s comments at ICJ appear to endorse armed struggle against Israel in what analyst calls an ‘unanticipated shift’ in stance
  • However, others say comparisons between speech at World Court and Mao-era rhetoric are overstated, noting Beijing still favours a two-state solution
  • eatCasserole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Shawamreh said Beijing’s early response to the war in Gaza emphasised non-partisan condemnation of “all violence” – a position Israel criticised as unclear and ambiguous –

    Alright then let’s be clear FREE PALESTINE 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸

    • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      It was unclear and ambiguous because it didn’t say explicitly that Israel should have a monopoly on violence. Also anti-semitic, probably.