boem@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoClimate models can’t explain 2023’s huge heat anomaly — we could be in uncharted territorywww.nature.comexternal-linkmessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1262arrow-down16cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1256arrow-down1external-linkClimate models can’t explain 2023’s huge heat anomaly — we could be in uncharted territorywww.nature.comboem@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square44fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarehydroptic@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·5 months agoIf a system’s purpose isn’t to produce heat, any heat it produces is waste heat.
minus-squarecucumber_sandwich@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·5 months agoIt’s whole purpose is to radiate specific radio waves…
minus-squarehydroptic@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-25 months agoYes, and it’s not infrared. Do you think the purpose of telecom systems is to produce heat? What the hell do you think waste heat even is? Waste heat is heat that is produced by a machine, or other process that uses energy, as a byproduct of doing work. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waste_heat
minus-squarecucumber_sandwich@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·5 months agoYes of course they proceduce waste heat as well. I was referring to the microwave part in the root comment…
minus-squarehydroptic@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoAhh right I see, I got very confused by the way you worded the comment but that may well have been a problem here on the receiving end
If a system’s purpose isn’t to produce heat, any heat it produces is waste heat.
It’s whole purpose is to radiate specific radio waves…
Yes, and it’s not infrared.
Do you think the purpose of telecom systems is to produce heat? What the hell do you think waste heat even is?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waste_heat
Yes of course they proceduce waste heat as well. I was referring to the microwave part in the root comment…
Ahh right I see, I got very confused by the way you worded the comment but that may well have been a problem here on the receiving end