I wouldn’t even know that shit because I couldn’t care less about what friends of potential criminals think about their crimes. That shit is utterly unimportant. Why should I waste my life time for remembering such silly things?
… a judge in New York, Lewis A Kaplan, said that when Carroll repeated her allegation that Trump raped her, her words were “substantially true”. Kaplan also set out in detail why it may be said that Trump raped Carroll. … “The jury … was instructed that it could find that Mr Trump ‘raped’ Ms Carroll only if it found that he forcibly penetrated Ms Carroll’s vagina with his penis. “It could not find that he ‘raped’ her if it determined that Mr Trump forcibly penetrated Ms Carroll’s private sexual parts with his fingers – which commonly is considered ‘rape’ in other contexts – because the New York penal law definition of rape is limited to penile penetration.”
Trump denied the allegations, prompting Carroll to sue him for defamation in November 2019 … A verdict in May 2023 found Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming Carroll … Judge Kaplan clarified that the jury had found that Trump had raped Carroll according to the common definition of the word. … In September 2023, Kaplan issued a partial summary judgment regarding Carroll I, finding Trump liable for defamation via his 2019 statements.
civil only needs a preponderance of evidence. criminal requires beyond a reasonable doubt. but even that isn’t high enough, in my opinion, to justify the government taking away peoples’ freedom.
Convicted rapists’ friends condemn convicted rapist.
Guilt by association is no joke! Even friendship can be dangerous! Better to avoid any human contact to not draw suspicion.
Way ahead of you.
should be pretty easy for right-wingers. forever alone.
Meh. I think not giving your friend a standing ovation or defending him after he’s been convicted of rape is a good start.
I wouldn’t even know that shit because I couldn’t care less about what friends of potential criminals think about their crimes. That shit is utterly unimportant. Why should I waste my life time for remembering such silly things?
Oh, that’s juicy. Source?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Polanski#Sexual_abuse_case
The Oscars:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXnNOBj26lk
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey_Weinstein#Sexual_abuse_convictions
The Oscars:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LItdTkVlKrk
See also:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_abuse_in_the_American_film_industry#Accusations_of_complicity_and_criticisms
Friends of multiple convicted rapists condemn suspected rapist.
Not suspected:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/aug/07/donald-trump-rape-language-e-jean-carroll
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump
Civil isn’t criminal, wasn’t convicted, unlike Kimmel’s friends.
Worse. It was a finding of fact. It’s a fact that Trump is a rapist.
civil only needs a preponderance of evidence. criminal requires beyond a reasonable doubt. but even that isn’t high enough, in my opinion, to justify the government taking away peoples’ freedom.
You can talk like you’re authoritative on the subject all you want, but that’s no where near true. Dude probably is, but proven? Nowhere near.
“You can talk like you’re authoritative on the subject…”
Talks like they’re authoritative on the subject without providing a single shred of backup.
🤌
Knowing what “convicted” means is a pretty high bar to aspire to, I know, but keep at it, you’ll get it eventually.
“Decades ago, the now President of the United States raped me.” - E. Jean Carroll
You don’t read much, then. 🤦🏼♂️
One the front page right now. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/10/trump-denies-carrolls-claims-after-posting-91point6-million-bond-.html You, read.
I do, bootlicker. Try again. Or don’t. Doesn’t seem to matter to the thinking world either way.
Removed by mod
Adding “when to quit” to the endless list of things you don’t know? Oh, sweetie…
You all can seriously go die in a fire. Insults are apparently fine when it’s you idiots, so the mod can go first.
So, that’s a yes.