• CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    If chess were a new game released today, I imagine a lot of these “why’d they make it political” types would probably object to the fact that the most powerful character in the game is the only one that’s clearly stated to be a woman.

  • lugal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s not about killing the king. The king can never be killed. It’s about keeping him in check until he can’t move anymore

    • Formesse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s also worth noting the term is “capture”. And outside of rare instance - you didn’t really want to kill knights and the like: You captured them, and ransomed them back to their family/liege lord etc.

      And there is a reason the term “Kings Ransom” exists. John the II of France for instance was captured, and Ransomed for something like 300000 gold coins of the day - something like 300 million or up to about 3 billion in today’s dollars (conversion is a little fuzzy but to put it simply: A BLOODY TONNE OF MONEY).