• MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    That’s probably so it’s easier to see them instead of being hidden on the outside edge of your foot I’m guessing?

      • Fermion@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Because the way you probably raise your foot toward you when putting on your socks ends up with that spot pointing toward your eyes.

        As to how that helps before you’ve actually got the sock on, you’ll have to ask the designer.

  • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Honestly it would be more mildly infuriating if they both weren’t on the inside of the foot so I’d say you’re good.

  • qwrty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Ok, but why do they even need side indicators? I thought socks could go on either foot.

    • Lith@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I also have socks with side indicators. They’re designed to fit the feet, so the entire socks are asymmetrical. Theoretically you could go by the pattern, but when you’re pulling socks out of a hamper it’s a lot easier to match them via letters which you know are always at the ends. It’s pretty convenient and makes it impossible to match them incorrectly, so I think it’s a good design choice.

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        the entire socks are asymmetrical

        They are not. they are just mirror symmetrical