• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    What I’m saying is, there’s no right way to build a thing that is inherently wrong.

    • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      You could build it with no input sanitation. That’s wrong.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        Even a perfectly-built SPA is a thing that should’ve been a different kind of program (a native app or even something like Java Web Start) instead.

        • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I strongly disagree, but I respect your opinion which was no doubt formed by different experiences with web technologies than I’ve had.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Not that it’s inherently good or bad, but the heavier web apps get the more a browser represents a sort of virtualization environment that only runs one stack. I think that’s interesting.

            • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              What do you mean only runs one stack? Like front end framework? That would be the point. But it can communicate with any backend.