I want to see someone hold her feet to the fire on her more pseudoscience remarks now that conspiracy theories like that have drifted firmly into the conservative camp. Namely:
Does she still believe there are reasons to be hesitant about vaccines? Is her response to “Do vaccines cause autism?” more than a two letter word?
Can she provide the scientific papers which show that “wifi causes cancer”?
Could she explain why she’s against nuclear energy despite all of the information showing it to be safe? And if she would support new reactor designs that are inherently safer?
If she recants all of it, what’s her explanation for previously saying those things? Was she just pandering? And if so, what does that say about her “support” for a Green New Deal?
As someone in STEM who works for a green energy company, she needs to adequately answer all of these questions if she wants to earn my vote. Until then, she can go fuck herself.
I want to see someone hold her feet to the fire on her more pseudoscience remarks now that conspiracy theories like that have drifted firmly into the conservative camp. Namely:
Does she still believe there are reasons to be hesitant about vaccines? Is her response to “Do vaccines cause autism?” more than a two letter word?
Can she provide the scientific papers which show that “wifi causes cancer”?
Could she explain why she’s against nuclear energy despite all of the information showing it to be safe? And if she would support new reactor designs that are inherently safer?
If she recants all of it, what’s her explanation for previously saying those things? Was she just pandering? And if so, what does that say about her “support” for a Green New Deal?
As someone in STEM who works for a green energy company, she needs to adequately answer all of these questions if she wants to earn my vote. Until then, she can go fuck herself.
She’s a nut job.