• gianni@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    I dislike these types of puns because they only make sense in one direction.

    Here’s an example of a good pun because it makes sense in both directions:

    I meant to look for my missing watch, but I could never find the time.

    1. They couldn’t make time.
    2. They couldn’t locate the watch.
    • callyral [he/they]@pawb.social
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I dislike these types of puns because they only make sense in one direction.

      False. This pun goes in both “directions” (not sure what you mean by that, using your definition):

      1. “They slash them” with slash as a verb refers to slashing someone, therefore hurting them. That answers the question “How do non-binary people hurt each other?”.

      2. They slash them (they/them, “slash” is how “/” is pronounced out loud) refers to gender neutral pronouns, often used by non-binary people.

      • reattach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Maybe they’re saying that using the second meaning in the original phase (“How do nonbinary people hurt each other? They/them”) doesn’t stand on its own as a coherent thought. As you pointed out, it’s a pun, but the pair of sentences only makes sense using the first meaning.

        Compare that to the watch example: plugging in either meaning of “time” makes the sentence meaningful.

        Perhaps serious joke researchers should distinguish between weak puns, the “they/them” example, and strong puns, the “time” example. Weak/strong here are used in the mathematic/scientific/philosophic sense, not passing judgement on aesthetic quality.