• linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Blocking the pop-up isn’t violating the law. Nevertheless we needed the cookie for the login. If we didn’t get you to authorize the cookie you really had no business in the app because it would not work for you. It was a bad design but it was third party.

    But we couldn’t even pop that up because the browsers just tried to slide by any notifications about cookies

    • torstein@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      First-party cookies that are needed for site functionality (like a login cookie) dont require explicit consent.

      Feel free to proceed without a cookie banner.

      From gdpr.eu:

      Strictly necessary cookies — These cookies are essential for you to browse the website and use its features, such as accessing secure areas of the site. Cookies that allow web shops to hold your items in your cart while you are shopping online are an example of strictly necessary cookies. These cookies will generally be first-party session cookies. While it is not required to obtain consent for these cookies, what they do and why they are necessary should be explained to the user

    • TheChargedCreeper864@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It took me so long to figure out what you meant about accounts and stuff until I remembered you were talking about your own product. I get it now. Do you think it’s a similar situation here, where the site is reliant on these third-party cookies to function at all?