Authors using a new tool to search a list of 183,000 books used to train AI are furious to find their works on the list.

  • Gibdos@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I certainly hope that none of these authors have ever read a book before or have been inspired by something written by another author.

    • adriaan@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That would be a much better comparison if it was artificial intelligence, but these are just reinforcement learning models. They do not get inspired.

        • Khalic@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The brain does not work the way you think… (I work in the field, bio-informatics). What you call “neural networks” come from an early misunderstanding of how the brain stores information. It’s a LOT more complicated and frankly, barely understood.

    • Wander@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you saying the writers of these programs have read all these books, and were inspired by them so much they wrote millions of books? And all this software is doing is outputting the result of someone being inspired by other books?

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Clearly not. He’s saying that other authors have done the same as the software does. The software creators implemented the same principle into their llm. You are being daft on purpose.