• Sneezycat@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Am I missing something? I was baptized way before I had a gender identity, were they going to retroactively un-baptize me?

    It’s unfortunate they won’t, because I was too little to consent, but I definitely wouldn’t have.

      • frog 🐸@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s also a few denominations of Christianity (albeit protestant ones) who only baptise teens and adults, as they believe baptism has to be a conscious choice rather than something done to an infant in order for it to be valid.

        • alex [they, il]@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, almost mentioned them but they wouldn’t be covered by the Pope’s decisions, but you’re right - and I assume in some catholic communities they might have similar practices even though that’s a minority case.

    • liv@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The being baptized part is relevant to converts, and the being a godparent part would have relevance for all transgender catholics.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seriously, there are a lot of negative stereotypes about the Catholic church that I think Pope Francis is basically dunking pretty hard

    • interolivary@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah I have to say that I generally don’t know jack from shit when it comes to the Catholic church, living in an overwhelmingly Protestant country, and that’s if people can even be bothered with religion, so all I really had were negative stereotypes. Don’t often see the Catholic church in the news unless it’s about something bad.

      So this move definitely felt surprising to me, although eg. the part about baptizing transgender folks being OK as long as there’s “no risk of causing a public scandal or disorientation among the faithful” was a bit, well… I guess funny is the wrong word. How does one assess the risk of a transgender person’s baptism disorienting the faithful? What does thst even mean?

  • x-Cell@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This doesn’t mean shit.

    I was raised catholic. It’s basically church doctrine that anyone is a child of God, and pretty much almost anyone can be baptized.

    It doesn’t mean you’re not a sinner who’s going to burn forever in hell. It’s just the famous anti-lgbt talking point “hate the sin, not the sinner”.

    This will lead LGBT people to a false sense of security before they go straight up to conversion therapy.