The Trump administration on Thursday asked the Supreme Court to allow it to enforce an executive order signed by President Donald Trump ending birthright citizenship – the guarantee of citizenship to virtually anyone born in the United States. In a trio of near-identical filings by Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris, the administration urged the justices to partially block preliminary injunctions, issued by federal district judges in Seattle, Maryland, and Massachusetts, that bar the government from implementing Trump’s executive order anywhere in the country.

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The real issue is “subject to the jurisdiction”.

    People “subject to the jurisdiction” of US law are constitutionally guaranteed a number of rights. Importantly, they are afforded due process, and all other rights due someone accused of a crime.

    Not everyone is guaranteed 5th amendment protections. In a “Red Dawn” situation, where the Russians/North Koreans launch an airborne invasion of the US, those enemy combatants are not subject to US laws; they are not guaranteed the rights of the criminally accused.

    Any rights and privileges they have are conveyed via treaty, not constitution. Hague Convention. Geneva Conventions. Laws of Armed Conflict. None of these guarantee “Due Process”. None of these guarantee access to the judicial system.

    One more piece of the puzzle: The Posse Commitatus Act. This law prohibits the US military, (and the National Guard, when federalized) from directly engaging in domestic law enforcement activities.

    Trump wants to use the military to handle immigration issues.

    Texas has already declared immigrants to be “invaders”. Trump’s campaign was not using hyperbole when it was talking about an “invasion”.

    Trump wants a “war”. He wants a shooting war on the southern border, and he’s going to use the immigrant “invasion” to justify it.