• VisionScout@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    now canada needs to invest in proper public transportation, so in the future people wouldn’t need to buy a car just for day to day life.

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Open the door to Chinese EVs” isn’t a simple solution because it has wider reaches than restricting Tesla-imports. There’s a reason Germany just effected tariffs on chinese EVs, namely because they are arguing that as china subsidizes their EVs, naturally non-subsidized local companies could never be price-competitive.

    I don’t know how that situation is in canada, but I bet similar things have to be looked at.

    I like the solution, but it’s not a simple one.

  • Slayan@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    We dont need chinese ev to wreck US car industry. We need toyota and their hilux truck brand. We could build a toyota electric car manufacture around quebec’s battery shop and a toyota hilux around alberta.

  • pdqcp@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I have a better alternative: invest in viable alternatives to driving! expand protected bike lanes, build the damn high speed rail, more trains, trams and bus lines. One more asphalt lane for cars wont solve traffic problems :)

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      That would work for much of the population that lives within 100 miles of the US border, but there is a lot of rural and green space in Canada, and bikes aren’t great in Canadian winters. Canada needs good car options too.

      • Nalivai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        As of the 2021 census, nearly 6 million people (16% of the total Canadian population) lived in rural areas of Canada.

        84% of Canadians live in cities, and that’s where good urban infrastructure is the most needed.
        Making car-centric infrastructure mostly electric will help a bit, but not a whole lot.

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          And spending that money to get us cheaper transit in the long term will probably also free up more resources to help the remaining 16%.

      • pdqcp@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Oh, I agree that mass transit wouldn’t really work in areas that aren’t as dense, but we should definitely have those where possible. I didn’t mean to say we don’t need good car options, but we should also have more options besides just cars

        Now regarding bikes and winter, I’d say that’s more of an infrastructure problem. Finland also has terrible winter, yet they can bike as usual. You should watch this video if you are interested in this theme: “Why Canadians Can’t Bike in the Winter (but Finnish people can)”

        • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I understand that infrastructure is more important to be able to cycle in the winter, even eclipsing temperature in very cold areas. I live in an area where there is no bicycle infrastructure, I’m actually 100x safer riding my motorcycle well below freezing on the road, than riding my bicycle on a beautiful fall day. And I do, I have gear for it .There are cities though, where temperatures don’t regularly get super cold and people don’t actually have the clothing and gear to cycle in the winter. I would guess in those areas, temperature is more of a factor. In areas where winters are consistently very cold, people already have what they need and are able to cycle if the infrastructure is there.

          • Nalivai@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            That’s the thing, with infrastructure you don’t need special gear to ride in winter. You commute on your commuter bike in your regular clothes that you use for everything else. You don’t need to run crazy speeds or jump over crazy hills, you ride you commuter with the same intensity you would have if you just walk.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        In cities at least, bikes are just as good as cars in winter. Your city just needs to put as much effort in to building and clearing bike lanes as it does car lanes. Places that give a shit actually plow and salt their bike paths and bike lanes.

        • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          In cities at least, bikes are just as good as cars in winte

          Your bike has a heater built-in and a way to block out the cold wind and/or rain?

          That’s usually what people mean when they mention vehicles in the winter, not just the road being cleared

            • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              Having ridden bikes in snow (and would be willing to again): yeah, no, they’re a very different experience and to pretend otherwise is to engage in a shocking level of willful ignorance

    • epicstove@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Walkable cities. Biking infrastructure. Reliable public transit.

      Regularless of of what’d going on in the world right now, these would make our cities far better.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Love this idea; however, bringing Chinese cars is like applying pressure to the wound… fixing public transportation is the long term healing process.

      1 - They are not mutually exclusive, bring the Chinese cars now while starting on the long term public transportation projects

      2 - The Federal gov can act on the Chinese cars now… public transportation is 100% Provincial purview so an entirely different team needs to address this other priority

    • thefool@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Our newly-elected Premier has unfortunately doubled down on giving cars priority with the mandated removal of bike lanes and building new highways (413), even though their own data says that Toronto with be just as congested a few years after building them.

      Oh I forgot to mention the tunnel under the 401, which is a massive boondoggle waiting to happen

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        we have the reverse problem in west of us, removed some car lanes for bike lines causing huge congestion that the bicyclist barely use anyways.

    • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      As someone who loves driving cars, I’m completely on board with this. Driving should be optional, and I’d love to leave the car home when I go out partying, or don’t want to worry about leaving my nice ride somewhere sketchy overnight.

  • Septapus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    The world needs to tariff ALL elon companies and move away from American products/offerings in general. We need something to replace AWS in the worst way. The world needs to remember the corporations foreign and domestic that helped faciliate this and freeze them out because if they do it here in the US they WILL do it in your countries too. Toyota helped fund 1/6 for example. I will never buy a toyota because of it and elons companies will never get any patronage from me either.

  • chakan2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Please please please…BYD is making super cheap Tesla killers. I’d love to get my hands on one.

  • vegantomato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Bad idea. China isn’t better than the US, and their EVs are a safety and security risk in and of themselves.

    I can imagine Canada being in a position to collaborate with friendly countries to develop a safe, secure and open alternative to Tesla and “CCP-mobiles”. If that becomes a reality, everyone benefits.

  • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yes, more Chinese infrastructure, that phones home and can be turned off remotely, with a switch, is definitely what the West need.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I dont think there is a single privacy friendly EV on the market.

    If a Canadian company could build and export an EV that wasn’t loaded with invasive sensors and where the data recording and uploading was opt-in (or non existent), loads of US Americans and Europeans would import them from Canada.

    • neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m pretty sure the VW E-Up is (can be made) privacy friendly (the datamodule that sends the data to VW and into your account can be replaced with an OVMS datamodule)

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Why just a tariff? Just ban all Tesla vehicle imports and all sales of new Tesla vehicles. For owners of existing vehicles they should be offered a generous buyback and equally generous loan terms for a new or used car. That would encourage most Tesla owners to trade-in their vehicles.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    That feels like “robbing Peter to pay Paul”. We don’t want to be dependent on either nationalist autocracy.

  • SabinStargem@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think Europe or Canada should make EVs, and Greenland being given incentives to tap into their minerals to feed the materials necessary for the project. Greenland gets closer to independence, and whoever makes the cars gets to piss on Musk. Win-win, no need for the risk of CCP becoming too influential within democratic governments.

    …While trade is a good thing, I think that maintaining at least a moderate level of manufacturing industry and sciences within your nation or cultural sphere to be very important. Just in case things get weird, like how 2025 has been.