Popular porn sites now display unproven health warnings thanks to Texas law::Popular online adult film sites in Texas are posting health warnings about watching porn, despite the fact a law requiring them to do so was blocked in August.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember when people on the Internet generally universally agreed that it was bad when the government (or anyone) regulated or censored the Internet?

    I want those times back. It isn’t any better whether it is because of left wing causes like “misinformation” or “hate speech” or right wing ones like the thing this article is about or “piracy” or “terrorist propaganda”.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That was before someone on Twitter’s best addition to the conversation was to call me “a caribou diaper baby” … which while a very creative insult … is pretty ridiculous conduct.

      I agree the government regulating speech is a fine line. We don’t need real information being suppressed, but we also need a way (with checks and balances) to shut people that are entirely full of shit (or people that if the Internet was a real establishment would be kicked out for being deranged and unhinged) up.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      See those downvotes? Yes, that’s because those times were conditioned by the Internet being a niche thing. You can’t expect such adequacy today even here.

      That aside, legally fighting “misinformation” is outright obvious censorship, not even trying to pretend to be something else.

      • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am 100% fine with censorship of known falsehoods. Let them appeal it in court. Even the tools behind 1/6, besides the biggest tool at the top, won’t even risk perjury and probably contempt, in court, with the risk of jail, unlimited fines, and permenant censorship from mass media on the line.

        I would prefer the falsehood to left up, colored a deep red and shrunk down to like 8pt font with a pop up on your curser that comes up when you hover over it, stating the fact of what it is; such as ‘unproven’, ‘demostrably false’ hyperlinked to evidence, ‘conjecture’, or ‘MTG - Jewish Space Laser crazy’.

        Pick up social issue, it doesn’t matter your stance on it. Chances are, there is a science behind it that clearly takes a position. Facts over feelings.

        Changing your mind when given new information is a strength, not a weakness. Doubling down on error…? That’s some flat earth, you are definitely going to an old folks home now, kind of shit. That’s how it looks. Onset dementia.

        I apologize to those with real onset dementia, we know you didn’t choose it, you’re still worthy of respect.

      • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I once hoped that if the Internet were more popular, society at large would become more like the Internet.

        Hahahahahaha no