They aren’t the same person as the original comment, but no their words did not say they were a nazi, they only said this post wasn’t as bad as some noteworthy Nazi that someone else brought up. I wouldn’t call that a complement, but they answered your first question directly. Then you manipulated their words into an demanding question and they gave you word vomit back.
Idk who these writers are, but I assume the aggressive response got the irrelevant answer
Meh, it wasn’t extreme, I was just trying to figure out what it might have been, and when re-reading it I found it may have been that. I’m just a random 3rd party so take what I said with a grain of salt. Or a grinder, I do really like nice salt/pepper grinders. They are just satisfying… Though the electric ones are annoy me. Why take away all my satisfaction and overcomplicate something nice.
Maybe I’m alone, but I didn’t read their comment as saying the artist is somewhat of a Nazi, but just somewhat bad. As in there’s a certain level of “badness” before the term Nazi applies. It felt like they were commenting on the level of “badness”, not the level of “Naziness”.
I don’t know who stormtoss is. I took it you were saying that this comic artist was like stormtoss but not as bad. Then I offered that we skip all that and talk about the comic instead.
A new Stonetoss huh
dot world starting to look more like voat than reddit
I’m not familiar, can you explain for the class?
Stonetoss is a comic writer who is also just straight up a nazi, and makes a lot of pretty bad comics.
I don’t think the guy who made this comic is on his level but I’m only judging off this single one.
So you’re saying that this guy is a nazi and his comics are bad, to some noteworthy degree.
Any comment on his actual point here?
What is the point?
They aren’t the same person as the original comment, but no their words did not say they were a nazi, they only said this post wasn’t as bad as some noteworthy Nazi that someone else brought up. I wouldn’t call that a complement, but they answered your first question directly. Then you manipulated their words into an demanding question and they gave you word vomit back.
Idk who these writers are, but I assume the aggressive response got the irrelevant answer
I didn’t think my request was that far out but ok, I will watch it in the future.
Meh, it wasn’t extreme, I was just trying to figure out what it might have been, and when re-reading it I found it may have been that. I’m just a random 3rd party so take what I said with a grain of salt. Or a grinder, I do really like nice salt/pepper grinders. They are just satisfying… Though the electric ones are annoy me. Why take away all my satisfaction and overcomplicate something nice.
Maybe I’m alone, but I didn’t read their comment as saying the artist is somewhat of a Nazi, but just somewhat bad. As in there’s a certain level of “badness” before the term Nazi applies. It felt like they were commenting on the level of “badness”, not the level of “Naziness”.
Al Quaeda? Never met the guy.
so you would rather not address this point directly.
I have legitimately no idea what you’re actually trying to say.
I was just replying to the user explaining who stonetoss was, I even said in my reply I don’t think this guy is like him.
Or are you trying to pretend stonetoss isn’t a nazi? Idk what to tell you there lil guy.
I don’t know who stormtoss is. I took it you were saying that this comic artist was like stormtoss but not as bad. Then I offered that we skip all that and talk about the comic instead.
Clear?
I think you’re either not very bright and too argumentative for it, or a troll.
Either way post less.
It’s Stonetoss, but I’ll be damned if that isn’t an amazing intentional typo. (Likening Stonetoss to Stormfront.)