Dutch population must stay below 20 million, ministers say - DutchNews.nl
www.dutchnews.nl
The right-wing Dutch government is looking at drawing up specific targets to limit immigration and ensure the population of the Netherlands remains below 20 million by 2050. Immigration minister Marjolein Faber and social affairs minister Eddy van Hijum told MPs in a briefing on Tuesday that the cabinet was embracing a report by the government’s demographic development commission which recommends a population ceiling of 19 to 20 million inhabitants. The cabinet “supports the need to work towards that scenario and...

Summary

The Dutch government is considering measures to cap the Netherlands’ population at 20 million by 2050, responding to a demographic commission’s recommendation.

Currently at 18 million, the population’s growth raises concerns about pressures on housing, healthcare, and education.

Immigration minister Marjolein Faber and social affairs minister Eddy van Hijum emphasized stricter asylum limits and more targeted migration policies, with further research underway.

Economists warn that an aging population might necessitate increased foreign labor or domestic reforms, as 3 million extra workers by 2040 is deemed unfeasible.

  • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldEnglish
    634·
    23 days ago

    That’s just looking for an excuse to close borders to keep migrants out. It’s a right winger saying this.

    The fertility rate in the Netherlands is 1.49 now, way below replacement rate, so the usual “we have to stop people from having kids” is done. Mission successful. Congratulations.

    What they usually don’t say is who’s going to keep production high and do the work that’s needed if you don’t have enough kids to replace workers retiring and keep all the migrants out. Stop people from retiring and stop trying to grow the economy I guess.

    • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.worldEnglish
      61·
      22 days ago

      The thought tends to go I) internal birth rates are failing because the cost of raising a family is too high ii) part of that cost is driven by high accommodation costs and downward pressure on wages iii) both of these are alleviated if immigration is restricted

      I’ve no idea if that would actually work, but the logic makes some sense (obvious flaw being if you restrict immigration you lose workers now but internal births take a couple of decades to compensate)

      • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldEnglish
        21·
        22 days ago

        Looking at Japan, China and Korea, countries with falling birth rate and strict immigration policies, it seems that the expected higher wages and increased births never materialize. The remaining workers are just squeezed harder so the economy can continue to function and grow, what results in people having less children because they have to work so much, and it ends up in a downward spiral.

    • Saleh@feddit.orgEnglish
      1·
      22 days ago

      it is also a genius strategy for a country that relies heavily on trade, having two of the largest ports of Europe, to close itself off from the rest of Europe.