• Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    1.1. Saturnian clinical case 1

    1.1.1. First part

    Doctor D.P. 52 terrestrial-year-old male (Saturnian 1 year 10 months old), obtained his doctoral degree of specialization at the age of 29 and was recognized as the second for its promotion in Medical School. As a young neurosurgeon, he is as active as when he was a resident and passed his fellowship.

    [Paragraph of description about Doctor D.P.]

    As an example, he takes the Saturnian rocket to participate in the annual conference of the world Saturnian Federation of Neurosurgeons which takes place in “Utopia” the country located 200,000 km from his workplace.

    [Another paragraph of description]

    His colleagues know that they can count on him to take a night’s call or take care of an additional patient because he does this with joy.

    Today, 23 years after (10 Saturnian months) Professor D.P. realizes that he is married and has two children, but he knows nothing about them. He does not even remember any details of his marriage. He just remembers that reading medical papers on his own was the best moment of his rare holidays with his wife.

    There’s a plot! This paper is wild, avant-garde, a breath of fresh air.

    • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      There are way too many weird spelling issues for me to think this is an LLM, I honestly think this was done for fun

  • hobovision@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 month ago

    Lol it’s a letter to the editor and has a creative commons license.

    Yall ate the onion.

  • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 month ago

    Okay, I asked an MD friend about this, it’s a letter to the editor framed as a case study to be clear, not a real published case study, they believe it’s a genuine letter to the editor about surgical ethics with a creative setting to avoid naming real names. Actually makes a lot of sense.

    • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s actually way more interesting than the stupid outrage that the original tweet is trying to stoke.

      • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah the outrage bait was stupid to begin with, “Letter to the Editor” is clearly visible in the picture in the tweet

    • stoicmaverick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nevermind the questions. The answers you’re looking for are: “high as giraffe pussy” and “in the author’s second language”