• enbyecho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Right so… “let’s do the thing the fascist threatens to do because we’re right and it’s justified” is not the same thing as the fascist saying “we’ll do it because we’re right and it’s justified”.

    Easy to justify the means when you believe in the ends… but of course every one thinks they are right and that everyone else will come to believe they are right, thusly conveniently avoiding any bad consequences.

    Do you have any idea what would have happened if Biden just arrested Trump?

    • 0ops@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, it might be just to arrest him, but America clearly doesn’t give a fuck. The fact of the matter is the people picked Trump this election, if nothing else arresting him will only galvanize his followers and legitimatize their own turn to fascism. There’s no good outcome in this scenario, we missed that opportunity on election night. It sucks but right now we’re the kid playing with fire; obviously we need to learn the hard way. We should’ve learned from the last trump presidency you say? Yeah, we really, really should’ve.

    • Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Breaking the rules isn’t fascism though. Fascism is fascism.

      What do you think is a more ethical choice:

      a) uphold the law, knowing it will let fascist come to power and kill thousands

      a) break the law and stop him

      • enbyecho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Breaking the rules isn’t fascism though. Fascism is fascism.

        It is precisely fascism. It’s ignoring the rule of law to achieve authoritarian aims. Why is it ok when you agree with the outcome and not ok when you don’t? But way more importantly, once you do it you cannot go back. If Biden did this and Trump ended up winning - make no mistake Biden has no authority to remove candidates from ballots - then Trump would feel completely justified in jailing his opponents.

        What do you think is a more ethical choice

        A. Because the premise of your choice is flawed. You do not know that breaking the law would stop him. You do not know -with certainty- that not breaking the law would result in that outcome. But we do know that being authoritarian to achieve aims we believe in is no better than people we disagree with doing the exact same. What would happen if Biden was successful in stopping Trump but then, because we wouldn’t ever keep unfettered presidential power… right? RIGHT? We’re the “good” guys… what would happen if MAGA Republicans won in 2028? I doubt we’d ever have another election again.

        • putainsdetoiles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I doubt we’d ever have another election again.

          With Trump in office, and Project 2025 in the pipeline, I doubt we’re ever going to have another election anyway.

        • TheHighRoad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Uh, Trump feels completely justified in jailing his enemies already. Will it happen? I’m not excited to wait and find out.