• shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    It really depends on the community you’re talking with. In the Bitcoin community that would not surprise me in the least if it’s just big holders dumping on little holders to cash out for fiat. In the Monero community however that’s totally different because they want to use it as actual money. They, and I include myself in this category, believe that the government should absolutely not have control of our money supply that they can manipulate at any time for any reason or no reason at all and make everyone less wealthy, with the exception of those who they choose to give “government contracts”, “incentives” or “subsidies”. This is why the libertarians say that taxation is theft because they tax you on your productive hours of your life and call it an income tax and then they give it to the people who they choose to flatter and leave you homeless and shit.

    • overload@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      Income taxes go back into services that help society. How do you expect a government to fund any of the infrastructure and services that you take for granted around you without it?

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        First off, we have to agree that we need the government in order to fund infrastructure. If we make that assumption, then sales tax on anything other than food and base essentials.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Lower income people spend - as a proportion of their income - far more of their income than higher income people. This makes the “nothing but sales taxes” approach much more regressive than it initially seems, despite often being touted by economists as a progressive approach to taxation.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m sorry, no. The point when you find yourself relating to libertarians is the time you should really ask yourself two simple questions

      1 - Am I a dumbass?

      2 - Why am I trying to herd myself in with a group of dumbasses?

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        And that’s why we are different people. I have my opinion and you have yours. You’re not going to change my mind and I’m not going to change yours and we both already know that.

        • meco03211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago
          1. Yes
          1. Cause it’s warm and comfortable in this mass hive of stupidity. Who wouldn’t want to be one of us?

          Went ahead and filled in that questionnaire for you.

    • Num10ck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      ok but why not gold or silver then? also obviously without currency controls all modern countries would have drastically smaller economies.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      You can believe that all you want, but this is an even nutter dream than achieving effective gun control in the US (one of my nutty dreams). Why in the world would the government ever give up control of the “money supply”? That’s not going to happen.