I’ve often assumed Harris didn’t want to insult her boss by going against him, because I got the impression she was planning to give Netanyahu what for once she took over - especially with him escalating things further and further. Did anyone else get that vibe, or was it just wishful thinking on my part?

  • ArdMacha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    Why did they think Trump is going to help Palestine? He’ll give Israel a black cheque to end Palestine completely.

    • Randelung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      They don’t think that at all. It’s Trump by default and Harris has to convince to switch. It’s an unfair emotional battle. All of these opinions were “Harris not good enough, therefore Trump”, and Trump never had to clear the ‘good enough’ bar.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Harris not good enough, therefore Trump

        For many people it was never trump, but it was a choice between Harris or leaving the presidential vote section blank, or voting third party. Just because you (@Randelung) equate any lack of vote for Harris as a vote for trump doesnt mean the rest of us think like that.

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          That’s kind of how it ended up working out though, innit? Harris actually lost the popular vote.

        • Randelung@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Fair enough. I didn’t consider not voting (or third party for that matter) as an option, but, as you say, that’s my subconscious bias.