Joker@sh.itjust.works to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days ago‘It’s not close’ - Israel committing genocide concludes Wikipedia ending editorial debatewww.middleeastmonitor.comexternal-linkmessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up1707arrow-down130cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1677arrow-down1external-link‘It’s not close’ - Israel committing genocide concludes Wikipedia ending editorial debatewww.middleeastmonitor.comJoker@sh.itjust.works to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square86fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarejonne@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·7 days agoUnfortunately they can’t quote Wikipedia directly in their work, but they can use the sources in the article.
minus-squarejagged_circle@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 days agoWut? I think the South African report is the source for Wikipedia.
minus-squarejonne@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·7 days agoIt’s a joke about how you can’t quote Wikipedia directly in papers, etc.
minus-squareGreyEyedGhost@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·7 days agoI imagine you actually could count their ruling as it’s an original work, based on research from other papers. Which I find kind of funny, because that would mess up so many professors…
Unfortunately they can’t quote Wikipedia directly in their work, but they can use the sources in the article.
Wut? I think the South African report is the source for Wikipedia.
It’s a joke about how you can’t quote Wikipedia directly in papers, etc.
I imagine you actually could count their ruling as it’s an original work, based on research from other papers. Which I find kind of funny, because that would mess up so many professors…