He then ends up suggesting the reason they don’t like Harris is because she’s a woman -

“Because part of it makes me think – and I’m speaking to men directly – part of it makes me think that, well, you just aren’t feeling the idea of having a woman as president, and you’re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for that.”

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    They know voters would be turned off by the more accurate message: vote for me and we can turn the steering wheel of this massive machine slightly left for 4 years

    That’s exactly the message they’ve been running on since 2008.

    Obama’s “the long arc of history bends towards progress” speech was this practically verbatium. And it was popular precisely because it was seen as modest and achievable. The problem is that Obama didn’t achieve it. He spent eight years treading water from the Bush Era, during which he normalized a bunch of the illegal, unconscionable, and ultimately detrimental practices of the Bush Administration before handing the reins over to… Donald Trump.

    History didn’t bend towards progress. It whipped directly back in the face of those enthusiastic moderates. But the only lesson it appears to have taught them is that even Obama was too ambitious and too extreme, despite bending over backwards to appease moderate Republicans. So Biden stepped in as an even more conservative version of Obama. Two years into office, he too gets hit with a backlash, which the party took to conclude they were too radical under Biden.

    Now we’ve got Harris, a candidate who has fallen fully in line with the Cheney family on litany of domestic and foreign policy issues. Will this turn voters off? Will it prove that the Cheneys are too left-wing for the American voter? Only time will tell.

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Biden stepped in as an even more conservative version of Obama. Two years into office, he too gets hit with a backlash, which the party took to conclude they were too radical under Biden.

      Biden has been firmly left of Obama on economics, environmental, and foreign policy.

      What makes you say Biden has been more conservative? What aspects specifically

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Biden has been firmly left of Obama

        He campaigned by co-opting a number of Bernie’s platforms in 2020 and immediately abandoned them on taking office.

        What makes you say Biden has been more conservative?

        He cut back a bunch of progressive social programs on the back end of COVID, then ratcheted up military and police spending and sent big financial kickbacks to a bunch of morbund corporate interests. His DOJ has fixated on drug crime and immigration crime, while going nearly blind to financial crime and civil rights abuses. O&G drilling surged on his watch, particularly on public lands. He’s been steadily privatizing everything from the post office to the space program.

        Dude’s to the right of Ronald Reagan.

        • kandoh@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Okay and he’s also done:

          1. Climate and Environmental Policies: Biden’s administration has pushed for significant investments in renewable energy and environmental justice, including provisions in the CHIPS Act for climate responsibility plans[1][4].

          2. Social Equity Initiatives: Executive Order 13985 aimed at advancing racial equity reflects a focus on equal outcomes, aligning with progressive principles[1].

          3. Healthcare and Social Programs: Biden supports expanding healthcare access through a public option and has backed student loan forgiveness, both progressive stances[2].

          4. Labor and Economic Policies: The administration expanded overtime pay and introduced consumer protections against discriminatory practices, aligning with leftist economic reforms[4].

          5. Gun Control Measures: Biden enacted significant gun safety legislation and established the Office of Gun Violence Prevention, advocating for stricter gun control[3].

          Citations: [1] Funding Leftism, Making Power Grabs: The Biden Administration’s … https://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/report/funding-leftism-making-power-grabs-the-biden-administrations [2] Political positions of Joe Biden - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Joe_Biden [3] Joe Biden political stances: Where he stands in 2024 - NewsNation https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/2024-election/joe-biden-political-views-2024/ [4] 30 Things Joe Biden Did as President You Might Have Missed https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/02/02/joe-biden-30-policy-things-you-might-have-missed-00139046 [5] Democracy Policy Under Biden: Confronting a Changed World https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/02/democracy-policy-under-biden-confronting-a-changed-world [6] Opinion | Biden’s Democratic Party is to the left of Obama’s. Thank a … https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/07/13/why-progressives-winning-inside-democratic-party/ [7] Joe Biden’s surprisingly progressive agenda - Vox https://www.vox.com/21322478/joe-biden-overton-window-bidenism [8] Here’s what Biden and Democrats have gotten done over the last 2 … https://www.npr.org/2023/01/01/1143149435/despite-infighting-its-been-a-surprisingly-productive-2-years-for-democrats

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            My guy, how do you post links to the fucking Heritage Foundation and the Carnegie Endowment with a straight face?

            Environmental Radicalism. In a similar vein, Executive Order 14008 claims that America must achieve “significant short-term global reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and net-zero global emissions by mid-century or before.” This approach to “climate change” and “environmental justice” will impose tens of trillions of dollars in costs on the economy, with much of the burden falling on the poor, farmers, and small businesses, lowering the standard of living for all Americans, with negligible environmental benefits.

            Debasing Science. Not every government-spanning initiative by the Biden Administration has required an executive order. A memorandum from the Office of Science and Technology Policy and the White House Council on Environmental Quality in November 2022 called on the federal government to use Indigenous Knowledge (IK), which is associated with tribal communities and cultures

            This isn’t evidence, its a right-wing screed.

            • TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              Pretty sure they used an llm and didn’t bother to review it

              Edit: like I did in response, but at least mine is customized to my style and positions, and cites better sources

          • TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            Climate and Environmental Policies

            Biden’s climate initiatives, such as the CHIPS Act and Justice40, are insufficient. They rely heavily on market-based solutions like tax credits and incentives, which fail to challenge the power of fossil fuel industries or enforce stringent regulations necessary for rapid decarbonization. The slow implementation and lack of aggressive action on carbon removal and methane reduction highlight a reluctance to confront corporate interests directly (McCarthy, 2023; Hsu, 2023).

            Social Equity Initiatives

            Executive Order 13985 focuses on equal outcomes but does not address systemic issues that perpetuate inequality. This approach lacks a transformative vision to dismantle entrenched structures of racism and economic disparity. True social equity requires redistributive policies that go beyond symbolic gestures and tackle wealth inequality, housing, and education access head-on (Gordon, 2021; Alexander, 2021).

            Healthcare and Social Programs

            Biden’s healthcare policies, including the proposed public option, fall short of the comprehensive reform needed. They maintain the dominance of private insurance companies instead of moving towards a universal single-payer system that guarantees healthcare as a human right. Similarly, student loan forgiveness initiatives are piecemeal solutions that do not address the root problem of skyrocketing education costs driven by profit motives in higher education (Klein, 2021; Friedman, 2021).

            Labor and Economic Policies

            While expanding overtime pay and consumer protections are steps in the right direction, they do not fundamentally alter the power dynamics between labor and capital. These measures fail to address wage stagnation, job insecurity, and the erosion of union power. A better approach would prioritize empowering workers through stronger labor rights, collective bargaining, and significant wealth redistribution (Bivens, 2022; Jacobs, 2022).

            Gun Control Measures

            Biden’s gun safety legislation is inadequate in addressing the systemic causes of gun violence. It focuses on moderate reforms like background checks without challenging the influence of the gun lobby or addressing deeper issues such as economic inequality and lack of community resources. A more appropriate approach would involve investments in mental health services and community-led violence prevention programs (Miller, 2021; Vanneman, 2021).

            References