renzev@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoI have the weirdest aesthetic preferenceslemmy.worldimagemessage-square95fedilinkarrow-up1727arrow-down128
arrow-up1699arrow-down1imageI have the weirdest aesthetic preferenceslemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square95fedilink
minus-squareWaxedWookie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·12 hours agoThe complexity is likely a product of redundancy and error correction in the QR code rather than making it unique. You begin to run into issues with camera resolution and whatnot, but in theory those codes are likely more reliable.
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-26 hours agoQR codes have built in redundancy and error correction, though. I guess if they had it turned up to the max for some reason?
minus-squareNoxy@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 minutes agoyeah, qr codes have different levels of error correction that you can specify, could very be well turned up to the max or the url has a ton of tracking params appended to it for some reason
minus-squareWaxedWookie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoYeah - that’d be my guess for an over-complicated code with minimal info.
The complexity is likely a product of redundancy and error correction in the QR code rather than making it unique. You begin to run into issues with camera resolution and whatnot, but in theory those codes are likely more reliable.
QR codes have built in redundancy and error correction, though. I guess if they had it turned up to the max for some reason?
yeah, qr codes have different levels of error correction that you can specify, could very be well turned up to the max
or the url has a ton of tracking params appended to it for some reason
Yeah - that’d be my guess for an over-complicated code with minimal info.