• Nix@merv.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Still sucks you will need a phone number to use it though. Hopefully they adopt meshnet type technology similar to https://berty.tech so people can communicate even when the internet is shut off across all platforms with end to end encryption

  • Instantnudeln@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    What is this stupid website. Cant open it because they have banned my IP. Why the fuck do they ban MullvadVPN servers?

  • pedroapero@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    They will allow to hide your phone number from your profile, but what about your profile name ? This will identify you after your username is used. So you must also remove your name from your profile, this will confuse your previous contacts (I’m not sure if names come from profile or contact list actually).

    I feel the options for phone number display are not sufficient to have several privacy profiles.

  • SecurityPro@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Download and installed but it still insists on a phone number. I don’t see a way to bypass.

    • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I believe they still require a phone number for the TESTING phase but it can be the same oje you already use for your regular Signal (if im understanding it correctly)

  • aprnu@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    c’mon Signal, gimme that apk & I give you some logs in return, don’t make it hard on me

      • sudneo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Privacy and anonimity are different things. As long as nobody besides you and the indented destination(s) has access to the content of your communication, that communication maintains privacy, even if everyone sees that it’s you talking.

        Also, and this is something I mention all the time, the only information this gives is that you use signal. Besides that, as soon as anybody else registered your phone in their contact list, your phone number is already known and associated with you considering that many apps (like all the meta ones) gain access to the contact list and the chance that anybody who has your phone number uses one of those is almost 100%.

  • blazera@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Im an idiot visiting from the front page. But this headline without context is wild.

        • qprimed@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          love me some briar, but signal is a legitimately decent privacy focued app with serious mindshare, adoption and ux/ui features. I love them both, but unless the other person is a technophile, signal is my go to recommendation and briar remains my “secret club” app.

            • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              My exact use case haha. Became invaluable when the internet was unavailable. Used my phone’s hotspot to create a wlan, then used it to communicate with those I needed to. Communicate internetlessly with your nearby groups, brought to you by Briar.

              • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                So if Im at a music festival or something similar and I dont have phone service I can still just make a hotspot and send messages out through the hotspot signal?? Thats so awesome if Im understanding that correctly

                • pedroapero@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  You would likely face another issue in that scenario: briar + hotspot draining your battery.

                • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Only if those you’re sending to are also on the same hotspot signal. Basically, you’re creating a local wifi network, and Briar works over WLAN.

              • gribodyr@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                Hmm, could you elaborate on this? What was your exact use case for Briar, how did it help solve it, and what were the challenges?

                • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  We were with several other groups and had no internet, but needed to communicate through text. Briar filled the gap with its ability to communicate internetlessly through a local network (as long as the others are on the same network). Creating a hotspot with one phone and connecting the others makes a wlan with your group inside. Could you tell me what I’m missing from my explanations? I’d be happy to elaborate further if I knew.